Monday, December 31, 2007

Browns Finish At 10-6

We discussed back in October the Browns had a legitimate shot at 10 wins and a playoff spot in 2007. We were half right.

Cleveland got to 10 – which is usually good enough to get you in - but a bad loss in Cincinnati late cost them football in January. They have no one to blame but themselves. The Browns opened the door for the Titans and Tennessee walked through it.

Sunday’s win against the 49ers was very predictable. San Francisco was down to its fourth quarterback, who had only been in camp for two weeks. Once Josh Cribbs went the distance with an early punt return, the Browns’ coaching staff decided to keep it simple – put it on the ground, chew up clock and see if Chris Weinke could beat you.

Anderson made one excellent toss to Braylon Edwards for BE's 16th touchdown catch of the season. That and Cribbs’ return is all that was needed. In total, he (DA) only threw it 20 times. As it turned out, all they needed on this day was a quarterback to, and I hate this term, “manage the game” to beat an inferior S.F. squad. A double digit season-clinching win soon followed.

Here is how we graded them out.

Ownership gets an A. They spent to money necessary to improve the offensive line and got back into the first round to get Quinn. Both wise moves - both short term and long-term.

Management deserves an A-. Most of Phil Savage’s moves panned out.

Romeo and company get an B+. They did get to 10 wins in year #3. The down side is it the defense was terrible, especially against the run, nine of 10 wins came against sub .500 teams, and along with having a relatively injury-free season by NFL standards, the Browns failed to reach the post-season. You've got to reach football in January to earn an A in my book.

Look for Romeo to pick up a ton of Coach of the Year votes. He's well-liked and got them to 10 victories. In the end, I see Mr. Bill (in New England)winning. However, he's disliked by many and Jeff Fisher could sneak in and get the honor since his team got in (post-season) without a ton of stars leading the way. Besides, you know my take on awards - to vote before the season ends makes no sense.

DA gets a B. Why a B? It’s simple, a good NFL quarterback posts, at minimum, a 2-1 touchdown to interception ratio and completes at least 60% of his passes behind this line, with these receivers and that running game. Anderson, like that hurler who has a 97 mph fastball but can’t spot it consistently, ran hot and cold. He has a big arm, a quick release and proved he can start in this league, but the Browns will have an new quarterback taking snaps in 2006. They didn't give up a #1 & a #2 to have Quinn hold a clipboard for long.

And for those in the media that are speculating the team might deal Quinn instead of Anderson in the off-season, they should have their pens and notebooks confiscated. That will not happen.

The offensive line gets an A+. A total of 20 sacks allowed and a 1,000 yard back says it all.

The running game deserves an A-. Lewis earned himself the starting lead back role for the foreseeable future.

The receivers earned a B+. The Browns were the only NFL team with two 1,000 yard receivers (K2 & Braylon Edwards)and a 1,000 yard back, but there were simple too many drops to give an A. We counted five drops in the season-finale alone - two by K2 who had his worse game as a pro in terms of catching the football. Call me old school, but if it’s thrown to you, and you get paid to catch it, you should.

Josh Cribbs, the team’s MVP, and his cohorts on special teams clearly earned an A+. Some are pointing to the blocked field goal against the Raiders as a special teams breakdown that caused the Browns to miss the playoffs. Right.

Without the consistent great play on special teams this fall, the Browns are at best a .500 team.

The secondary is by far the most difficult unit to grade out. Why you ask? Look at who they played against for most of the season. By my count, they went up against nine back-ups in a quarterback-starved league. The 49ers, for example, were down to their fourth signal-caller yesterday. Therefore, they (secondary) weren’t tested often. And when they were, they often failed. We’ll give them a C-.

This front seven can be graded as one unit as far as I am concerned. Their main job is to stop the run and put some heat on the QB. They did neither - especially the former. Therefore, a D is in order. The only reason it isn’t an F is the fact that they occasionally got stops on short yardage and they weren't lit up the final month of the season.

So what did we learn in 2007?

We found out that after years of futility, the team finally established home field advantage – setting a franchise record for home wins (7). That’s good news.

We now have an identity (read: swagger) on offense with a vertical passing game that features tall, athletic receivers who play with an edge, and a solid running game in reserve. That's very good news.

We also know that the defensive front seven needs overhauled. That’s bad news.

Imagine what kind of numbers L. Tomlinson might put up next week had the Browns reached the post-season? Scary isn’t it?

The key question heading into the off-season is as follows - are they (Browns) truly headed in the right direction with a 10 win season under their belt or was the double-digit win campaign a result of a very weak schedule and an injury-free year?

Much like the Cleveland Cavaliers of the past couple years, when a team is coming off a statistically successful season (back-to-back 50 win seasons in basketball & a 10 win campaign in football), there is a tendency to tinker only when it comes to making personnel changes.

For the record - this observer wants Savage and company to get very aggressive in terms of making changes on the defensive side of the ball, re-sign Lewis, add another quality receiver on offense and upgrade at quarterback.

That should just about do it.

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Saturday Special

We have some time on on hands right now during the holidays, which is nice, so we decided to give you a Saturday Special.

(Romeo in Miami)
The national media is keeping the rumor alive that Bill Parcells would like to have Romeo Crennel as his coach in Miami.

Here is how I would handle it as the Browns’ GM – if I may be so bold.

A #2 pick and a #3 pick in the upcoming draft should just about do it.

Then the Browns can take their #2 and the Dolphins’ #2 - which will be at the top of the round, and turn it into a mid #1. Let’s keep it simple here guys - that #1 pick should be turned into the best defensive player available. Period.

While we are at it, let’s see if the “Big Tuna” wouldn’t mind doing a “two-for.” Perhaps he wants a quarterback to go along with a coach. I know a big, strong armed signal-caller who just set a Cleveland franchise record for touchdown passes that should be available. A sign and trade would do nicely here as well.

Meanwhile, while the Browns are negotiating with Miami over compensation for Romeo, they should also be talking to Marty and/or Bill Cowher about becoming the team’s new head coach. We covered this ground last year. But if the opportunity knocks again, open the door.

If the Miami rumors are true, Savage and the Big Tuna should already be talking. And if Vince Young doesn’t pull a DA and meltdown in the biggest game of his career against the Colts, the Browns can have the deal done early next week.

That would be a fairly productive start to the off-season, don't you think?

Get draft picks for Crennel, turn those picks into serious talent on defense and sign a future Hall of Fame coach to run your club.

My motto when it comes to changing coaches is as follows - I do NOT make a change unless I clearly UPGRADE. With all due respect to RC, MS or BC would be a serious upgrade.

If only the rumors were true and Savage was as aggressive as yours truly.

(More Miami)
The dumbest sports comment of 2007 came late but it was special. On Thursday, December 27, at approximately 1:13 p.m. in the afternoon, an ESPN analyst actually mentioned Maurice Carthon’s name with a straight face when discussing possible head coaches in Miami. Classic.

Yea, we know Parcells and Carthon go way back. But what qualifies Carthon to run a team?

A little history lesson from his days in Cleveland.

This is the same guy who had K2 off the field on third down, the same guy who had Dennis Northcutt ahead of Joe J. on the Browns’ depth chart and the same guy who took his best back off the field on short yardage plays. Need I go further?

You would think so-called analysts would have some common sense and think before spewing the garbage someone else is feeding them.

(Miami Take III)
Damon Jones wants traded. Not only that, he wants to go back to Miami. This guy is delusional.

Here’s a simple question – who wants him?

He’s limited in talent, overpaid, can’t defend and has shot the ball poorly since coming to Cleveland.

It was also reported that last week that Jones and Ira Newble refused to go into a game during garbage time when summoned in by Cavs' Head Coach Mike Brown.

Fining them is not enough. The Cavaliers should see if they can get 12 Spalding basketballs (men’s basketballs of course) for them in trade value. If not, they should be released.

You cannot let the inmates run the asylum. These two guys simply can’t play but somehow cashed in on life’s lottery when the Cavaliers signed them to multi-year deals several years ago.

The single dumbest move in Cleveland sports history was when the previous regime signed Kevin Ollie and Ira Newble, two guys who would have a hard time starting at North Carolina right now, to multi-year deals.

Remember that brainstorm? I always wanted to know how the thinking process on that one worked.

Here goes:

Cavs' Paid Player Personnel Professional #1: "We need these two guys. They are good."

PPPP#2: "Yea, you are right. I have seen them play. They would make us better."

PPPP#3: "And they are available too."

PPPP#4: "Hey guys, I hate to differ with you but these two are role players at best. Practice players if you will. Why would we offer them large multi-year deals? They belong on the end of an NBA bench at #10 through #12 in the rotation. Neither guy would see any quality time on a good team come playoff time. There is a reason they are available. Why should we make such a heavy investment on guys with minimal talent level?"

Former Cavs' GM Jim Paxson: "It's three to one. I'm going with the majority. I'll call their agents in the morning. Good work guys. We got a lot done here today and the franchise is better for it. Meeting adjourned. Hey, you guys want to go to Wendy's for lunch then come over to my condo and watch a VHS tape of me running off screens and nailing jumpers during my playing days in Portland?"

PPPP #1, #2, @ #3 - "Sure, boss. Good idea. Love to."

PPP#4 - "No thanks. I think I'll go home and update my resume."

Nice........

And you wonder why the Cavaliers are over the cap with minimal talent.

I'm back on point again. Stay with me.

Now they (DJ & IN) aren’t happy about their playing time. Only in America folks could this happen.

If you can’t deal them immediately, cut them loose. Send a message that this silliness will not be tolerated. You don’t need a cancer, or two, on the bench. It’s bad enough 23 doesn’t have any talent around him. Now he has malcontents there as well.

Come on Danny (Ferry), do something. Let me know you are still alive. We sent out an Amber Alert in the summer, we asked if you were in the Witness Protection Program back in the fall and we are counting down the days before the trading deadline when we demand your dismissal.

Show me you have a pulse – get active.

It’s not like these two aren’t replaceable. It would be the classic example of addition by subtraction. I know, I know. They would count against the cap if you let them go.

Sometimes, you have to cut bait and run. Don’t compound one mistake with another – in this case, keeping them around to cause headaches for your coach, who has a hard enough time trying to find four guys who can give him consistent minutes.

Point made.

(NFL Network)
Hey, if two NFL teams are playing but hardly anyone is watching, does it count?

The NFL finally threw the public a bone (read: caved to public pressure) and decided to air the Patriots – Giants game on national television instead of on their silly NFL Network alone. Good call.

One more time - the NFL Network concept, as designed, was the biggest mistake the NFL has made in years. The pompous league assumed cable companies would automatically add it to their service. Wrong.

Fans that do not have the package are unhappy and the league knows it. Look for that concept to change dramatically next year, regardless what the league is saying, so the average fan gets the games.

Don’t sweat the details. That’s for the league and cable companies to sort out. But you WILL be able to see all the games next year. The NFL should and will correct this blunder.

Patriots Versus The World
ESPN is at it again. This time they are already comparing the 2007 Patriots to some of the NFL’s greatest teams and having Bill Parcells analyze who would win.

We saw this stunt before, just three years ago when the network did the same thing with the USC team that featured several future first rounders, including the next OJ – Reggie Bush. I had to get that one in for you DB - it was too easy.

By the way, quick quiz: Which former USC back just went over 1,000 yards rushing for the season? Wrong. It wasn't Gale Sayers (aka: Reggie Bush). I'll give you a hint - he plays with the Titans and we stated back when he had the body to be a better "true" NFL back (read: 20-25 carry guy) than Mr. Bush when everyone else had Reggie in Canton already.

Here's the bottom line however- neither guy is going into the Hall of Fame.

Hey, we get one right once in a while.

We did found out one interesting tidbit about that game against Texas recently. Bush was not on the field on fourth and short late in the game when USC went for the kill. I have no problem with Carroll going for it. It showed some real stones. A first down conversion on fourth and two wins the game. With that offense, a two yard pickup should have been a better than 50-50 proposition. But Bush should have been on the field.

As much as we didn't think he was the next coming of Jim Brown, we too recognized his (Bush) immense skill level and you ALWAYS have your best players on the field at key moments unless they are on a stretcher getting treatment.

Nice move Pete.

Back on point again. I'm bouncing all around today. That's okay. If you can follow me, it means you are intelligent and learning at the same time.

A funny thing happened on the way to crowning that USC team as one of the greatest teams ever – they lost to Texas in the National Championship game.

ESPN should have learned a lesson the first time around. I know, I know – the bit makes for good television. Still, I think it’s appropriate for the Pats to win the Super Bowl first before they are mentioned with some of football’s best teams ever.

(Bowl Season)
Hey, when is the Peach Bowl being played? Oh, I forgot, that bowl went out of business years ago. That’s okay, there are over 30 more bowls to choose from. Only a sick freak (you know who you are) could watch ALL this stuff and enjoy it.

(No Post Play)
I watched some NBA this week and noticed something that is all but extinct – centers that can consistently score in the low-block. There aren't many true centers that can consistently score with their backs to the basket. In fact, many of the game’s best post players are actually power forwards, not true centers (i.e. KG, Duncan, Howard, Bosh, etc…), who actually are as comfortable facing the basket as they are posting up.

Look at Cleveland’s Z, he’s 7-3 and at his best catching 23’s drive and dish, and taking that mid-range jumper.

The NBA has turned into a jump shooting league – and a bad one at that, along with a running league, for those coaches who have figured out their team doesn’t have the consistent post play to win playing half court basketball.

That works when jumpers are falling (i.e. Bulls of 2006-07), but a recipe for disaster when they aren’t (Bulls of 2007-08). Ask Scott Skiles, a terrific coach, who just got canned because his post-less Bulls got out of the gate poorly this fall.

Years ago, most teams had a real threat down low. Now, the opposite is the case. The game is dominated by perimeter players, and has been for the most part, since MJ was winning titles in Chicago. Even then, you still had Akeem in Houston and Ewing in New York, true centers, who demanded attention in the block. What center playing today is of that caliber?

Yao Ming? Maybe. And that's a reach.

(Long Haired Safety)
Don't ask me why, but I love long-haired safeties, especially if they are Samoan. I saw a few minutes of the Boston College bowl game last night. That's right - I said "a few minutes." I told you I can't sit through a whole bowl game.

The guy wearing #44 was running around all over the place, throwing his body around like he didn't care. He had long hair too. The downside is he didn't look Samoan. Too bad.

Regardless, any guy who plays with reckless abandon and has those those flowing locks to go with it can play on my team anyday. I don't care what his wonderlick score is, what he runs the 40 in and how many times he can bench 225.

Geez, we covered a lot of ground today and you are better for it.

Feel free to respond. I have decided to begin answering inquiries/questions/comments, etc...

I'll also be signing books and doing a monthly reading at Borders in Cuyahoga Falls every first Tuesday of each month between 7-8:30 p.m. Yea, right.

See you next time.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

New Year’s Resolution Time

We’re going to try to back off on the following people this coming year:

We start with Cavaliers’ GM Danny Ferry, who we’ve described as being MIA for the past two years.

There is Browns’ quarterback Derek Anderson, who has established himself as a Vinnie Testaverde clone. The only difference is Vinnie rarely had this kind of protection and firepower around him.

Of course there is the 2007 NBA MVP Dirk Notwitzki, who has made taking fade-aways over shorter defenders an art form.

We will lay off those who use one of our favorite terms - “system quarterback.” There is no such thing. If you can play, you can play.

Here is the other beauty that gives me the shakes - "franchise player." I only want to see that term associated with a first ballot Hall of Famer, not some guy who just had a very good year.

We will also back off Z, Gooden and Hughes – who combine to take up a huge chunk of the Cavalier’s salary base, even though you rarely see all three on the floor at crunch time.

It is time to give Romeo Crennell a break – since he will be spending the better part of the off-season trying to improve what is supposed to be his forte – his defense.

I will not complain about the BCS anymore. Anyone who still defends that system is missing the basic gene the rest of us were provided with – the one that allows you to comprehend that titles are won on the field of play, not in a computer ranking devised by some of the same people who created Madden 2008.

We must avoid complaining about the hypocrisy in baseball – from the owners to the players and the networks included – all of whom played “hear, see & speak no evil” when guys were juicing up to the point where softball scores were the norm in MLB. Now they want the guilty to come forward while they play judge and jury.

It is time to lay off coaches in major college football & basketball, who hop like gypsies from one lucrative job to another, all the while telling their current players and future recruits they can be trusted.

I will try, although it will be very difficult, to refrain from complaining when I see a hitter swinging away early in the count with his team down three, as he leads off the bottom of the ninth, when it’s clearly appropriate to take a strike.

We try to go one year without calling Kobe Bryant the most selfish player in sports - the one who wanted “Big Deisel” out of town when LA was winning titles, then demanded more talent around him and since has asked to be traded.

It will be difficult, but I will resist calling Grady Sizemore an underachiever at the plate for striking out as much as he does when he could compete for a hitting title if he ever decided to shorten up some, especially with two strikes.

We will leave Pronk alone. He’s a good guy. It’s not his fault the Indians offered their DH $14 million a year while he was having his worst season ever. You would accepted it too.

I will not belittle the Yankees and Red Sox for having a huge resources advantage over the large majority of ML teams. Just please don’t tell me how bright Cashman and Epstein are. A blind monkey could run those clubs and they would still win 90+ with that kind of cash advantage.

I will try to abstain from saying anything negative about Mr. Happy, Bill Belichick. This resolution will be next to impossible to keep.

Of course the above is all subject to change if the mood hits me.


Now here are a few things I look forward to watching in sports in 2008:

I truly enjoy the unselfishness that is the Cavaliers’ #23.

Watching Victor Martinez make adjustments at the plate is worth the price of admission.

Seeing K2 snatch a football from midair is special.

I would pay to watch, pound for pound, the best player in NBA history do his thing – AI. He’s a warrior.

Observing Peyton Manning run the no huddle reminds me of what the sport was like before all the specialization - quarterback head sets, offensive coordinators calling the plays, scripting the first 15 plays, players studying photos of defenses prior to the snap, the Patriots cheating, etc… etc…

Watching a very ordinary looking (6-0/175 pounds) Steve Nash dominate the basketball floor against the world's best athletes is something to behold.


Here are things I will try to forget for 2008:

My prediction that the Broncos would be in this year's Super Bowl seems a bit off right now.

I wanted Michael Vick calling plays for the Browns if Brady Quinn was not available in the draft. How did I know he had a canine issue?

I thought the Indians would likely wilt down the stretch in ’07 like they did in 2004 & 2006, without Shapiro's help prior to the trading deadline.

I wanted to deal Butterfingers (Braylon Edwards) for a #2 pick prior to the ’07 draft. Yea I know, he set a Browns’ single-season record for TD receptions (15 and counting with one game to play). One reminder - he also likely set a team record for drops (14). The league probably has him at eight. Right.

I firmly believed some NBA team would tender Anderson Varejao an $8-10 million a year deal. If Larry Hughes is worth $12+ million a year, then AV is underpaid.

I thought Ohio State would lose at least three football games this season. Perhaps had they not played Kenyon, Oberlin and their third in-state rival, Mount St. Joseph, they would have. Hiram had no open date.

Those are just a few of our misses in 2007. Remember, when you get on record, you will swing and miss occasionally - even at a get me over fastball.

There is no need to remind you of the ones we nailed. They are too numerous to count of course. Niceeeeeee.

Browns 34 49ers 17
For what it is worth, we have the Browns handling their business against the 49ers next Sunday and the Colts taking care of the Titans. We love Vince Young, but figure the Colts at home will prevail - even with Manning wearing a ballcap in the second half. It will be interesting to see how Young plays in the biggest pro game of his young career.

That prediction probably means they (Browns) will be cleaning out their lockers on Monday.

Till next year you geeks, freaks and $#@!

Monday, December 24, 2007

DA Plays Santa

I guess I spoke too soon when I congratulated the Browns for making the playoffs.

I figured going into Cincinnati, only a meltdown of classic proportions would sink the Browns.

Well, it happened.

This week, you are going to read and hear about how “we” didn’t play well.” You are going to hear and read how “we need to learn how to finish.” You are going to read and hear how “we need to play better on the road if we want to be a quality team.”

Etc…etc…

Here is what you won’t hear – the Browns lost simply because their quarterback had another road meltdown. The only difference between this meltdown and the others he’s had in 2007 is the fact that he did it for 60 minutes instead of his usual 30 (first half) – see Oakland, New England, etc…

We have seen this all-too often. The man has 18 picks playing behind an offensive line that has kept his jersey clean for the better part of the season. He has 18 interceptions while throwing to one of the best receiving groups in the NFL. He’s managed 18 throws to the other team while possessing the NFL’s Comeback Player of the Year – if such an award were to exist, Jamaal Lewis, running behind him.

Get him out of his comfort zone, (home) and his numbers are a very mediocre 164-of-296 (.554), with 15 touchdown passes and 13 interceptions in 2007. And remember, these numbers were not posted against the Vikings' Purple People Eaters of the 70s, the 49ers of the 80s or the Cowboys of the early 90s, they were produced versus the likes of the Raiders, the Ravens, the Cardinals, the Jets and the woeful Bengals.

Here’s the other factor at work Sunday – the Bengals were horrible. They tried to give it back time and time again. Yes, they had a 100 yard rusher against the Browns' defense – who doesn’t? But overall, Cincinnati was anemic on offense. In the fourth quarter alone, the Browns had several drives that began in Bengal territory following a terrible punt and an ill-advised throw by Carson Palmer when all he had to do was hand it off and run clock. And when you thought the Bengals ran out of Christmas gifts, they coughed it up on their last possession – giving the Browns one last chance at survival.

The Browns didn’t lose Sunday because they could not run the ball. They did not lose because of dropped passes – although by my count they had four drops. By today’s NFL standards, that’s probably only two. They didn’t lose because the defense was shredded by Palmer and company. Cleveland lost because their quarterback had a horrible day against the same team he scorched for 50+ points the last time around.

Yes, the wind was bad. Here’s a bulletin - playing conditions in Ohio tend to be nasty this time of year. What do you expect the conditions on the Lake Erie to be come January if you ever make it to the post season – 60 and sunny?

Don’t worry about that forecast however. Unless Tennessee loses in Indianapolis, it’s wait till next year – again.

There is no reason why this team should not be in the post-season in 2007. They had everything going for them – a weak schedule, few, if any, key injuries and the bounce of the ball (see field goal/crossbar references).

Yet, they will likely have to wait and see what the Titans do Sunday night to determine their fate. You would assume the Browns will beat San Francisco. It’s at home, S.F. is not very good and Anderson will be in his ‘comfort zone” again (home) where he has thrown for 13 touchdowns and just five picks.

But it should not have come to this.

Here’s the semi-good news. The Colts have already announced they will play Peyton Manning one half next Sunday. That may be enough to beat the Titans and their anemic offense. I can’t see the Titans putting many points on the board in Indy.

Perhaps I’m wrong again – like when I said the Browns were in already.

I expect DA and the Browns to play well next Sunday and finish with 10 wins. The organization will spin it as a very successful season – regardless of what happens in Indianapolis later that evening. A 10 win season in the NFL is equivalent of a 50+ win campaign in the NBA. It looks very good on paper and wins you public relations points.

But the astute observer knows better. If you want to win it all – you’d better get it right with the guy taking the snaps. That’s on you Phil (Savage).

Don’t leave it up to Romeo, a career defensive coach who opened the season with Charlie Frye as his quarterback. RC is going to have a hard enough time heading into year #4 trying to figure out how to improve one of the league’s worse defensive units this off-season.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Football Friday

Pro Bowl Snubs
We have been front and center harping on the Browns being 0-for-71 in terms of the team's inability to draft Pro Bowl talent since its return. Well, that streak has finally been snapped by Josh Cribbs and Braylon Edwards.

We called Cribbs the team’s MVP several weeks ago and see no reason to change our mind. As for Edwards, he officially becomes the first Michigan wide receiver to make it big in the NFL in the last 20+ years. Congratulations to both players, Phil Savage and the team’s player personnel department.

The Browns did deserve several more Pro Bowl mentions of course. Cribbs and Edwards were no-brainers, but the same can be said for the team’s starting left guard (Eric S.) and tackle (Joe T), and tight end (K2). I know they received alternate tags, but they have played better than that in '07. Their time will come if the team keeps winning.

One question – why do they vote for these awards with several weeks remaining in the season? Players clean out their lockers on Monday after the season’s final week. Why not have them vote on their wait out?

Romeo - COY
Look for Romeo (RC) to get plenty of Coach of the Year votes. The team is a win away from the playoffs, and whether some of you like it or not, he is in charge and should receive the credit. If they were 5-9 right now, he would be getting the blame, right? It's only fair he gets some credit then for the turnaround. How much real impact he's had on the success of the 2007 Browns team may never be known. My guess is RC's biggest strength is that players play hard for him because he is likable, he defends them in public and treats them like men. That means a lot in today's sports world where athletes often care about themselves first, second and always.

Yes, I know the record is mostly a reflection of a very weak schedule and an almost injury-free campaign. We were the first to point that out back in October. But if I were voting for Coach of the Year, RC would still have to be at the top of my list. Would I rather have someone else in charge? Yes. I've named those coaches in past entries. But that does not alter reality.

Play The Kids
Every team that’s been out of it the past few weeks should be playing their young players to see what they can do – especially at the most critical position on the field (quarterback). Why J. Russell hasn’t been taking all the Oakland Raiders’ snaps the past few weeks is beyond me. Speed up the learning curve for the youngsters and get them on tape so you can begin evaluating them. Getting them reps in real games will provide them with some base experience and some confidence heading into 2008. For example, I commend the Ravens for naming Troy Smith their starter this week. They should have done so weeks ago. We know what the Kyle Bollers of this world can do already and it ain't much. The same can be said for a lot of NFL teams and their starting signal-callers.

Bill Parcells
He’s overweigh and pompous as hell, but he can coach. How long before Tuna, the new VP in charge of football operations in Miami, fires his coach and wears both hats – GM and head coach? I give it two years – max.

Marty In Cincinnati
Marty may end up in Ohio after all. If I run the Bengals, I go get Marty to coach my football team. Marvin Lewis has been there long enough to have built the following resume – a good offense, a poor defense and the longest team wrap sheet in the NFL – by far. I went to the post office the other day to purchase X-mas stamps and four of the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted on the wall wore Bengal colors. Just kidding, but you get the point. Marty would bring stability to a franchise badly in need of it. And like Bill Parcells, the man is a quality coach.

That’s free advice to the Brown family.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Bad Weather W, The Mitchell Report, & 23

Here’s your weekly does of knowledge you sick freaks.

Browns
It’s hard to evaluate any football game where the weather completely dominates play. Therefore, I won’t spend much time on the Browns’ ninth win of the season other than to congratulate them on making the playoffs. Again, I know it’s not official. Nor was it official when we declared the Indians divisional champs well-before they clinched. But it’s pretty obvious the Brownies will be playing into January unless they fold like a cheap tent.

Speaking of freaks – I felt Braylon Edwards played his best game as a pro on Sunday against the Bills. That's right - his best game. I know he didn’t have fantasy league stats, but he made several outstanding grabs under terrible field conditions. I was impressed. He showed consistency from the first snap to the last. That’s exactly what we want to see - every week.

Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Speak No Evil
Bud Selig should be fired immediately. This steroids scandal occurred on his watch. The head guy should take the fall. Unfortunately, that won’t happen.

Why you ask?

Because the folks that pay his salary (owners) are also culpable. Anyone with an IQ over 75 knew 10 years ago baseball was in bed with the devil (steroids). We discussed it openly with some of this blog’s readers when they were mere pups, too young to get a drink or get into a #$@! bar. Remember?

MLB did not want to upset the gravy train that included two players chasing history and the rest of the league putting up numbers that made a 30/100 season merely seem average. The league was going through a renaissance, although it was obviously chemically induced. No one cared.

The owners didn’t want to ask questions, the players did not want to be tested – they never do - and the commissioner looked the other way.

The fans were also guilty – guilty of either not caring or being stupid. We love offense in our sports society. The rules are all bent that way to create more interest and to sell more Viagra on television. The fans went along for the ride because it got them up out of their seats more. They were being entertained.

ESPN, the network that brought you wall to wall coverage of the Mitchell report as though it was the death of a sitting president, is also at fault. I don’t remember anyone at that network crying foul when 5-9 middle infielders were hitting home runs the other way on balls down and away with regularity. I don’t recall any ESPN major investigation into this anomaly during the late 90s and beyond. Now they can’t get enough of the scandal – with their commentators sounding the familiar theme of “they need to clean up the game.” Right.

We complained about this near weekend softball league 10 years ago. I'm not that bright. Many people a lot smarter than me, and a lot closer to the action, knew exactly what was going on. Now these same entities say baseball needs to clean up its act.

Hypocrisy reigns supreme here. The bottom line - some people have no conscience.

Understand this - if it wasn’t for Congress getting involved several years ago, we would not even be where we are today. Sure, there would be testing, but it would be weak in nature and 50 home run seasons would still be the norm for power hitters.

For some reason, some 70+ players were named in the Mitchell Report. Everyone knows that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Why they had to name these specific names and what happens now is anyone’s guess.

Do they suspend the players that are still active? What can they do with players who retired years ago but were mentioned? How will this affect Hall of Fame entry?

Bud Selig stated that he will look at every player named “on a case by case basis and act accordingly.”

Who will look at his case? Who will judge the person in charge when all this took place? Who will decide if he stays or goes? Probably no one, that’s who.

MLB sold its soul for exposure and the almighty $. No one in a position of authority had the stones to step up and say something was amiss. Now everyone acts outraged.

What a joke.

23
Right now, when he (LJ) doesn't get a triple double, or close to it, the Cavaliers struggle. They will start winning again soon - especially at home. James will put them on his back again. But it is truly sad to see what is going on.

Think about it - what is worse, having no talent and no plan to turn the franchise around? Or having the game's best player and relying on him to do EVERYTHING EVERY NIGHT to get wins?

Pretty soon Danny Ferry will finally begin to draw criticism. As usual, everyone is behind the R. Jampo Curve - once again.

Till next time you geeks, freaks and $#@!.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

I'm Tardy This Week

I’m tardy. I apologize. It couldn’t be helped – trust me.

Browns
I almost fell asleep watching the Browns beat the Jets last Sunday. It was that bad. If you are any good, you beat the Jets by three scores – at least. We all know this team isn’t that good. But as we said back in early October, 10 wins is not out of reach. Now it’s well-within reach. As we stated a long time ago, there isn’t much difference between 6-10 and 10-6 in this league. That’s where the large majority of the league belongs.

Health, schedule and the bounce of the ball often determines whether you finish with 6 or 10 wins in any given campaign. It looks like the former in 2007.


By the way, don’t ask me to try and figure out what Eric Mangini was thinking. It’s fourth and 11 deep in Browns’ territory. No, the odds are you won’t make it, but so what? You have all three time outs remaining if you don’t convert on fourth down. Put nine in the box, get a stop and make the Browns punt from deep in their end.

The Jets would have gotten the ball in likely decent field position with over a minute remaining with no time outs. One minute is an eternity in the NFL – especially with teams dropping eight in coverage with no rush.

Jamaal Lewis’ run to ice it away was reminiscent of Kevin Mack - for those of you over the age of 35. The rest of you have no idea what I am talking about.

One more time – DA had all day to count the house on Sunday. This line IS the best pass blocking line in the NFL right now. I know the opposition has been, for the most part weak, but they handled the Steelers’ rush the last time out, and have pitched several shutouts in not allowing sacks in games. That’s some sick work being done behind a fairly immobile QB. Appreciate what you are watching.

Over the Cap & Lacking Talent
Why is it that the Cavaliers are over the salary cap and have to pay a luxury tax (around $8 million) this year, yet are void of talent after 23? That doesn’t make any sense, does it?

I’ll tell you why – Z is overpaid, Gooden is overpaid and Hughes is way overpaid.

I believe all this happened on Ferry’s watch. Meanwhile, Jason Kidd is available, but the Cavs “don’t have the pieces” to get him according to most experts. Let me interpret that for you – they have very little talent anyone would want. And they are over the cap. NICE!

Don’t worry, Superman will be back soon and they will start winning more than they lose again – at least until they hit a good team in the post-season.

Go Mark Go
The Indians are making noise about acquiring Rich Haren from Oakland . I guess his contract runs through 2009 and is market friendly (i.e. less than $9 per). If this move is made, it is to buffer the potential loss of CC – at least through ’09. Haren is one of the better starters in the American League. Adding him makes sense for when they deal CC. Notice, I said "when." I am thinking positively. It's the right move long-term for the club and you know it. We've covered this ground already. Trust me on this one.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Better Late Than Never
The Cavaliers are about to match the three-year/$17 million offer sheet Anderson Varejao recently signed with Charlotte.

What took so long?

Varejao should have been in camp weeks ago since he truly is one of the team’s five best players and they need him on the floor.

How do I know this to be so?

Look down the stretch in the fourth quarter most nights and you will see AV on the floor. That’s all the evidence you need to know he was worth keeping and paying. This corner felt months ago AV would ask for an $8-10 million a year and get it from some NBA team if not the Cavaliers. We were wrong. So was Andy.

Regardless of that, the Cavaliers did not need to play hardball with AV. Why hurt a relationship with one of the few decent, young players with upside on this roster? Varejao wanted starters’ money but the Cavaliers felt he didn’t qualify. Just compromise and meet in the middle guys.

Someone forgot to tell Danny Ferry that it doesn’t matter who starts the game, it’s who finishes that counts, and the kid was on the floor in the game’s final minutes most of the time the past two seasons – certainly more so than either Z or Gooden.

So where are we now?

A disgruntled player is back in the fold. He can opt out after two years – which is possible if he plays well. No, the ill will created in the negotiating process will not last – especially with the fans, who will cheer loudly the first time AV takes a charge or goes on the floor for a loose ball.

LeBron and company will also be pleased to have their energy bunny back on the floor with them. They understand he brings a unique skill set to a roster void of high energy guys.

In the end, it turned out okay. It simply should not have taken this long.
At least they got it right this time by matching AV’s offer quickly. I just wish they would have done the same four years ago and matched Carlos Boozer’s Jazz offer sheet – a much better player than AV.

At least they didn't make the same mistake twice.

Cavaliers Without 23
The Cavaliers are winless since #23 has been out with an injury. Surprised? Of course not.

This is at best a 15-20 win team without him. We’ve been saying “get him HELP” for years now. Watching these guys trying to create offense without James on the floor almost makes one physically ill.

The clock is ticking Danny - we haven’t forgotten. You have 79 days and counting before you should be given a pink slip if you don’t improve this roster prior to the 2008 trading deadline (Feb. 22).

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Browns – Cardinals Observations

It's Simple -3 Is Bad
I am a simple man, remember? I learned a long time ago if you lose the turnover battle in football, you usually lose the game. The Browns were -3 in turnovers today against the Cardinals. Ballgame. They (Browns)are not good enough to overcome that kind of turnover disadvantage.

Undisciplined
The Bodden kick, the Poole late hit and the Frazier head butt didn’t help the cause either. Again, this is far from a finished product and penalties of this type, especially on the road, usually leads to an L.

DA
He had another early meltdown with three early turnovers – one of which was returned for a score. Anderson rebounded and played well in the second half, but the damage was done. Unfortunately, this has happened several times this year on the road to DA.

Here is this week’s lesson boys and girls – outstanding players play well everywhere while average & role players usually play well at home, when within their comfort zone, but they tend to be inconsistent/struggle on the road. I don’t have the stats in front of me – but I would wager a fairly large sum that Anderson’s numbers are much better when playing within the vicinity of the dog pound than after taking a flight.

PICK 6
I wonder what the stats are, in terms of wins and losses in the NFL, when a quarterback throws a pick returned for a touchdown. I can’t imagine the teams that have done that have a good winning percentage.

Back of the Playbook Time
Kudos for the offensive trickery that resulted in Cribbs finding Winslow for the two-point conversion. We have been calling for Cribbs to be used in short yardage and goal line situations for a while now. He has to be accounted for when he’s behind center or in the shotgun. The funky look gives the defense something to think about. Good.

Short Yardage Adjustment
I was also pleased with the early third and one call that involved faking it to the fullback up the gut and pitching to #31 around the edge. Obviously, “Chud” adjusted from last week’s inadequacies on short yardage calls. An adjustment was needed and made successfully. That’s just one more sign “Chud” needs to be kept – regardless of the price in the off-season. He will be one of the game’s most sought-after assistant coaches for head coaching jobs this coming off-season.

Defensive Woes
A passing team, Arizona, marched right down the field running the ball down the Browns’ throats on the final drive, resulting in a field goal. Don’t let the goal line stand fool you, that was ugly to watch. If you can’t stop the Cardinals’ running game with the game on the line, who can you stop? On that drive, I heard K. Wimbley's name called for the only time all day. His regression as a player in year #2 has had a domino effect on the rest of this defense. If he isn't making big plays, who is? The answer is no one - at least not on a regular basis.

Braylon
I can’t seem to go a week without an observation or two on “the freak” known as Braylon Edwards. He had an excellent game today, but I would like to know what defense the Cardinals were in on his side of the field. On several occasions, he was allowed to run free and catch the ball downfield with no defender even in the picture after the catch. Today, Arizona gave new meaning to “cushion” in their coverage scheme.

Secondly, when DA threw one at BE’s knees on the Browns’ last possession, Edwards gestured to DA that he needed to bring it up a bit. I’m sure Anderson appreciated the advice. Perhaps on his (Edward’s) next drop, likely to occur between 4 & 7 p.m. next Sunday, Anderson will return the favor by making a cradle gesture. No, I think not. Anderson seems like he's too mature for that. I can’t say the same for BE however. I can't remember ever seeing that gesture from Largent, Joiner, Monk, Rice, etc...Or even from Slaughter, Langhorne, Brennan and company.

It's a different era - I know. But I don't have to like it and will remind you when something is, as a wise man once said, "bush."

No Wideouts
The Browns have caught numerous breaks this fall when it comes to the opposition’s health, including the Cardinals having to play most of the second half without their #1 & #2 receivers today. Imagine how Browns’ fans would whine if Winslow and Edwards were out of the line-up for any length of time?

Special Teams
I thought the Cardinals’ special teams outplayed the Browns’ special teams today. Josh Cribbs had as nice punt return late, but his fumble was costly. We will give him one mulligan - it’s his first fumble and we have already stated he might be their MVP this year so far.

Replay Gift
I though Edwards was touched by the safety flying by on his touchdown grab. The replay official saw it the other way. As for the game’s final play, they got it right. I hope none of you disagree. If you do, you are a true homer and shouldn’t be reading this column. I don’t want morons (average fans) here. They don’t have the brain capacity to comprehend the copy. I detest the average fan and some day I will tell you why.

K2
He needs to stop complaining to the officials about being held up/grabbed downfield. How else are they going to cover him? More importantly, if the officials are paying attention, he won't be allowed to push off as much either. Just adjust and beat the man K2. By the way, that was a great decision by DA to go to Winslow on the Browns' last play. You go to your best player with the game on the line. And it almost worked.

Final Thoughts
This loss is not a stunner. Coming in, both teams had talent on offense and lousy defensive units. Their QB played better than ours for the most part, and their special teams outplayed the Browns special teams slightly. It happens.

The Browns needed one of these two on the road in back to back weeks when looking at the big picture. Look at it in baseball/basketball terms - it's like opening a five game series away from home in games #1 & #2. You need to get one and hold serve in your building. Obviously, next week’s game against the lowly Jets becomes crucial. Again, the scheduling gods are shinning brightly on the Browns.

If they don’t lose the turnover battle and get back to dominating special teams’ play, like they have most of the season, they should come home with a W in Gotham and in good shape with three to go.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Mid Week Rants

I'm back by popular demand.

Tebow & The Heisman
Not that I watch a lot of college football, since I get my fill of it and then some, in my line of work, but I learned this week that the Florida quarterback (Tim Tebow) has thrown for 30 touchdown passes and rushed for 20 more this fall. It’s the first time anyone has ever gone 20 & 20, let alone 30 & 20 at that level. His team is pretty good and they play quality opponents. So why is there talk of who deserves the Heisman? This guy is the hands-down winner and has been for a while. In fact, we consider him a real intriguing pro prospect. But that’s for another day.

Santana
I’m told the Yankees and Red Sox are both making a push for Johan Santana of the Twins. Hopefully, Mark Shapiro is watching closely. Whoever misses out on Santana will need to match that acquisition in the near future. That’s where CC comes in. Shapiro better pull the trigger on a deal if the Tribe can’t sign him. Otherwise, we will be all over his $#@! for not thinking long-term. We’ll stay on this one until a final decision is made.

Packers – Cowboys
The biggest game of the year in the NFC takes place tonight (November 29) and most of the country won’t see it thanks to the NFL and cable companies, who are busy pointing fingers at each other, as fans complain. By the way, it’s the NFL’s fault for putting these games on the NFL Network and expecting cable companies to fold and pick them up. The NFL is pompous beyond belief. If they don’t back off in terms of arrogance, they may eventually pay a price with the fans. That’s what happens when you’ve been the top dog so long. If it happened to the Roman Empire, it can happen to the mighty NFL.

Phil Savage Gets It
Here’s a quote on BQ from Phil Savage in today’s ABJ when discussing the future of Derek Anderson in Cleveland.

His comments on Brady Quinn - “I think Brady would plug in and do well. You have a pretty solid front line. You have a very motivated Kellen Winslow. You have Braylon Edwards making catches; you have Joe Jurevicius on the perimeter. You have a pretty solid running game. It’s a pretty enviable cockpit to be riding in right now.”

Let’s break it down, shall we.

“I think Brady would plug in and do well.”
Translation: We brought him in to be our starter, he’s developing nicely in practice and when he goes in, he isn’t coming out.

“You have a pretty solid front line.”
Translation: These guys are playing lights out, have surpassed all expectations and are making DA look real good.

“You have a very motivate Kellen Winslow.”
Translation: He’s a stud.

“You have Braylon Edwards making catches.”
Translation: He’s having a good year even with his league-leading NFL number of eight drops. (It’s more like 11 – but who is counting? Just me)

“You have Joe Jurevicius on the perimeter.”
Translation: How the hell did our previous offensive coordinator (Carthon) and wide receiver coach (Robiskie) look at these guys every day in practice and have Northcutt ahead of JJ? Thank goodness I made RC dump those two.

“You have a pretty solid running game.”
Translation: My pick up of Jamaal Lewis, coupled with the signing a quality left guard and the drafting a left tackle, will get me NFL Executive of the Year votes.

“It’s a pretty enviable cockpit to be riding in right now.”
Translation: A true NFL quarterback should be effective with this kind of talent around him and a good coordinator in charge.

Complete translation: If we had known our skilled guys would stay healthy all year long, and our O line was going to dominate, we would have put the kid out there a lot sooner.

In all seriousness, this is good news. It means Savage gets it when it comes to the most important position on the field – QB.

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Sunday’s Thoughts

Browns Clinch
Okay, they haven’t clinched a playoff spot yet, but with five to go and seven wins in the book following the win over the Texans today, the Browns need to go 3-2 against weak competition the rest of the way to get to the magical number - 10. It would take a near disastrous December for them to be on the outside looking in at year’s end.

Now the bad news – they have beaten one good football team this fall (Seattle). The Seahawks are the only team the Browns will likely beat in 2007 that finishes with more wins than losses. That includes their five remaining opponents. Hopefully, Browns' fans, and more importantly management, will realize this is far from a finished product.

Shades of Maurice
Stop it CHUD! Run Jamaal Lewis on short yardage downs instead of handing it to Wright or Vickers. Their “O” coordinator has done a good job this fall, but those two bonehead personnel moves on the Browns’ first two possessions against the Texans reminded me of horror shows from the past. Even had they worked, I would be on his case. You run Lewis when you need tough yards. He couldn't have been tired, the game just started. What’s next, Winslow off the field on third and six? Hey Chud, don't get cute anymore when simple will do.

K2
Speaking of Winslow, he’s a freak and exactly what we though he would be when we declared he was the best player in the draft several years ago and suggested my hometown get a bust ready. Assuming he stays healthy and has a 10 year career – which is a big “if” of course with his daredevil habits, you are watching a Canton, Ohio, enshrinee. He and dad will be the first player father-son combination in the HOF. Enjoy and appreciate watching this rare athlete. They don’t come around often -especially in Cleveland.

O Line
This is getting repetitive, but I can’t emphasize it enough, the Browns’ offensive line was outstanding again today, allowing one sack while wearing down the Texans’ defense, allowing Lewis to romp for over 100 yards on the ground. They run block well and they do a terrific job in pass protection. Other than that, they stink.

Defense Ds Up
The defense today actually played well against the Texans. It's been a while since we could say that -like all season long. Nice work fellas.

McDonald
The rookie seemed to have a good game in his first start at corner. Hopefully, we'll see more of him and find out if this was a fluke or he's got some real skills.

DA
With every game that passes against these opponents, Derek Anderson’s value goes up. I was informed this past week that Bill Cowher listed him among the league’s 15 best signal-callers on a network program. Good. The more of that we hear, the better. If the Browns can somehow get a first day draft pick (#1 or ##2) for him next spring, it will be an absolute steal. I would take the best defensive player available with that pick – regardless of position. I’m always looking ahead folks – just like Nostradamus.

Braylon Watch
We acknowledged weeks ago BE was headed to Hawaii but he might also lead the NFL in drops. That’s looking like a pretty good prediction. So let's have some fun and start keeping track. Edwards had one TD reception and one drop against the Texans today. On the year, he has 10 touchdown receptions and 11 drops this fall by my count – and that’s being kind. Imagine how good he would be if he had good hands?

Rainbows #1
I have complained for years about the collegiate Division I football system. This year is even more comical with everyone having at least one loss. In my book, Hawaii is the National Champion if they don’t lose. Stop laughing. Are you absolutely certain this week’s anointed #1 (Missouri) would beat them? Hey, I thought Boise State deserved a shot at the National Title last year before they played Oklahoma. I was told by numerous intelligent college football fans they would get waxed against the sooners. Right.

The Buckeyes have found a new way to win a title – don’t play. That's another residue effect of this stupid BCS system. They (OSU) played in a weak Big Ten, scheduled three in state patsies and are on the verge of playing for the National Championship if one of the two teams above them loses. Do you really think they could run the table against three quality opponents in consecutive weeks? That's the point - we'll never know.

I am normally against Congress getting involved in sports because there are more important things for them to concern themselves with. But college football at the Division I level is now a business with plenty of entities getting greased due to this silly system – coaches, athletic directors, sponsors, networks, bowls, etc… Everyone is satisfied but the fans. Polls show over and over again that 75% of college football fans want some kind of playoff format.

It’s time for Congress to step in and threaten action if this system isn’t changed. Threatening the withholding of federal college aid money should do the trick. They’ve done it with pro sports. There is no reason not to do it with major college football. Otherwise, this system will never change. And please don't tell me Congress should not mess with the purity that is college athletics. This is the same group of people that jump conferences from one year to the next, signs coaches to multi-million dollar deals, then fires them after two bad years, and has a system in place where student/athletes sit around and don't play for five, six or seven weeks before playing their final contest of the year.

Remember, approximately half the 2006 Division I teams went to bowls last season. That says it all.

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Big W In Baltimore

The Difference Maker
The Browns won today’s game against the Ravens because they had the best player on the field -– Josh Cribbs. That’s right, a special teams’ performer was the difference-maker again today.

Time and time again, Cribbs gave the Browns’ offense outstanding field position. It was on clear display on Baltimore’s kick off just after going up three with well under a minute remaining. Cribbs had another terrific return, carrying tacklers for extra yardage. As it turned out, the Browns needed every inch of that second effort to get the game-tying field goal.

At this point in the season, I would say he’s this team’s MVP. It’s not even close. He’s having a Pro-Bowl year and then some.

Jamaal Stood Tall
He looked 25 again against his old mates today. That’s about as good a rushing performance I have seen for a back that didn’t finish with 100 yards or more. Lewis looked like he was running downhill all day long – muscling Raven defenders time and time again.

14 Point Swing
The Browns starting safeties have played better in recent weeks. Today, Sean Jones and Rodney Poole combined on the game’s biggest play – a quarterback hurry, forced by a blitzing Jones, and turned into a 100 yard interception return by Jones.

Offensive Line
I have been lauding their performance all year long. However, just prior to halftime, they had a horrid series – combining for several holding and early starts penalties that looked both comical and sad at the same time. They re-grouped nicely in the second half. DA wasn’t hurried all day again, with the exception of a couple sacks late in the fourth quarter. Even on those sacks, it was more of a result of DA stumbling and panicking than his linemen getting beat off the ball.

DA
Speaking of Anderson, his best completion of the season came on the pass to K2 prior to Dawson’s dramatic field goal make just before overtime. On that play, Anderson delivered a nice ball under a heavy rush. Until that play, he was well on his way to a sub-par performance against a solid NFL defense.

We credit him with making a couple nice throws late, but after watching him against the Steelers and Ravens, we feel stronger than ever we have it right when it comes to evaluating his talent level. Quinn has a much higher ceiling and anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong.

Anderson reminds me of that hitter who gets fat off mediocre pitching but struggles against good stuff. There is nothing wrong with that. In baseball, you bat that guy seventh or lower in the order. Unfortunately, this is football, and having that kind of guy pulling the trigger on every play usually leads to trouble against quality opponents.

If I am right, DA will start lighting it up again now that the schedule softens.

Dr. Jekyl & Mr. Hyde
I still believe he’ll be in Hawaii come February, but now he officially has more drops than touchdowns this year after today’s performance. I realize I have to live with the drops. I covered that in a previous entry. That’s what good NFL receivers do these days on a regular basis. But please, let’s at least hold on after the catch. And no – I’m not bringing back his nickname. He’s progressed enough where we can let that one rest.

K2
Did you see K2 tell the Browns’ bench to throw him the football prior to the completion that set up the game-tying field goal? My wife actually mentioned that to me just before the ball was snapped. Who said women don’t pay attention when they watch football?

6-4 & Cupcakes Ahead
The screen flashed the Browns’ remaining six-week schedule and it illustrated what we pointed out over a month ago. Cleveland has the easiest schedule in the NFL down the stretch. The win over the Ravens makes the playoffs a real possibility. We said a split with the Steelers and the Ravens puts this team in the driver’s seat for post-season, and now that becomes abundantly clear.

The question is – is this team mature enough and do they have enough leadership (coaches & players) to take advantage of it?

Huge Win In Baltimore

The Difference Maker
The Browns won today’s game against the Ravens because they had the best player on the field -– Josh Cribbs. That’s right, a special teams’ performer was the difference-maker again today.

Time and time again, Cribbs gave the Browns’ offense outstanding field position. It was on clear display on Baltimore’s kick off just after going up three with well under a minute remaining. Cribbs had another terrific return, carrying tacklers for extra yardage. As it turned out, the Browns needed every inch of that second effort to get the game-tying field goal.

At this point in the season, I would say he’s this team’s MVP. It’s not even close. He’s having a Pro-Bowl year and then some.

Jamaal Stood Tall
He looked 25 again against his old mates today. That’s about as good a rushing performance I have seen for a back that didn’t finish with 100 yards or more. Lewis looked like he was running downhill all day long – muscling Raven defenders time and time again.

14 Point SwingThe Browns starting safeties have played better in recent weeks. Today, Sean Jones and Rodney Poole combined on the game’s biggest play – a quarterback hurry, forced by a blitzing Jones, and turned into a 100 yard interception return by Jones.

Offensive Line
I have been lauding their performance all year long. However, just prior to halftime, they had a horrid series – combining for several holding and early starts penalties that looked both comical and sad at the same time. They re-grouped nicely in the second half. DA wasn’t hurried all day again, with the exception of a couple sacks late in the fourth quarter. Even on those sacks, it was more of a result of DA stumbling and panicking than his linemen getting beat off the ball.

DA
Speaking of Anderson, his best completion of the season came on the pass to K2 prior to Dawson’s dramatic field goal make just before overtime. On that play, Anderson delivered a nice ball under a heavy rush. Until that play, he was well on his way to a sub-par performance against a solid NFL defense.

We credit him with making a couple nice throws late, but after watching him against the Steelers and Ravens, we feel stronger than ever we have it right when it comes to evaluating his talent level. Quinn has a much higher ceiling and anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong.

Anderson reminds me of that hitter who gets fat off mediocre pitching but struggles against good stuff. There is nothing wrong with that. In baseball, you bat that guy seventh or lower in the order. Unfortunately, this is football, and having that kind of guy pulling the trigger on every play usually leads to trouble against quality opponents.

If I am right, DA will start lighting it up again now that the schedule softens.

Dr. Jekyl & Mr. Hyde
I still believe he’ll be in Hawaii come February, but now he officially has more drops than touchdowns this year after today’s performance. I realize I have to live with the drops. I covered that in a previous entry. That’s what good NFL receivers do these days on a regular basis. But please, let’s at least hold on after the catch. And no – I’m not bringing back his nickname. He’s progressed enough where we can let that one rest.

K2
Did you see K2 tell the Browns’ bench to throw him the football prior to the completion that set up the game-tying field goal? My wife actually mentioned that to me just before the ball was snapped. Who said women don’t pay attention when they watch football?

6-4 & Cupcakes Ahead
The screen flashed the Browns’ remaining six-week schedule and it illustrated what we pointed out over a month ago. Cleveland has the easiest schedule in the NFL down the stretch. The win over the Ravens makes the playoffs a real possibility. We said a split with the Steelers and the Ravens puts this team in the driver’s seat for post-season, and now that becomes abundantly clear.

The question is – is this team mature enough and do they have enough leadership (coaches & players) to take advantage of it?

Sunday's Random Thoughts

ARod
He opted out of a contract that paid him $25 million a year for a deal that pays him $27.5 million a year. Of course, he got a new 10-year deal in the process. Many in the media are congratulating ARod and his agent for this move.

Here’s what I say – ARod is the greediest professional team athlete I have ever seen. He just came off another choke job in the post-season – not his first. Then he opts out and re-signs with the only team that likely offered him a raise. Why else do you think he went crawling back to the Yankees so quickly? The Yankees were probably bidding against themselves.

The last time I checked, the post-season in any sport is when great players step up. The $25 million man didn’t - again. Dirk N. (aka - charmin), of the Mavericks, got hammered by the media for his NBA playoff collapse. He was deserving of the criticism. Could you imagine the public reaction if DN could and would opt out for more $ and more years after his 2007 playoff performance?

Yet, ARod is lauded for his brilliance. Why?

Here’s why boys and girls - He’s given a pass for his greedy act because the New York (East Coast) media want him in their backyard. He’s a great talent, he makes for great copy and the arrogant talking heads and scribes out east want to witness first-hand ARod break Bonds’ home run record as a Yankee.

Why else would ESPN spend so much time on his signing the same day Bonds was indicted?

ARod’s image would have been better served had he not opted out. And it would have been enhanced had he donated some of his paycheck after another playoff flame out.

Of course, that’s unheard of, right? Why should he give money back? He needs every penny of that original $250 million deal. In fact, he needs a new 10-year deal right now after performing poorly at the most important time of the year.

Only in America!


Barry Bonds


When the feds want you, they’ll get you. Bonds is the biggest fish in the pond, so he’s in real trouble. They will make an example of him. And I don’t care whether baseball decides to put an asterisk next to his record or if they don’t vote him in the HOF on the first ballot.

Everyone is missing the real story - again.

The fault doesn’t sit with Barry Bonds and the other juice-heads (allegedly) who pumped themselves full of chemicals that added distance to their bombs. The fault sits with MLB for watching it first-hand and not stopping it 10 years ago when records were falling by the wayside and baseball scores looked like finals from a good weekend softball beer league.

They knew what was going on but decided to bury their collected heads in the sand. Money was being made and baseball had the nation’s attention – again.

Shame on them.

And the same goes for the media that also turned its back on reality. Either the reporters that covered the game were too ignorant to know what was going on or they didn’t have the stones to speak up.

When a guy who normally hits 10 bombs a year now hits 25 and is driving pitches down and away over the right field fence on a fairly regular basis, something stinks. Hell, guys were breaking bats and hitting balls off the walls or over them.

We said it then, and we say it again now – it’s not ALL the players’ fault for taking advantage. They have a short life span and are in the most competitive business in the world – pro sports.

It’s MLB’s fault for not stepping in sooner and the media’s fault for not exposing what was obvious. Instead, the focus was on the “juiced ball.” Remember?

They got it half right – something was juiced, but it wasn’t the ball.

Danny Ferry On The Clock
I am giving him until the trading deadline to improve the Cavaliers’ roster. If he does not, he should be relieved of his duties as the team’s GM the day the deadline passes.

Why?

He has not improved the roster the past two years – wasting #23’s super human efforts. He has not been able to come to terms with Anderson V. – the team’s energizer bunny. He overpaid an injury-prone Larry Hughes.

And he recently admitted his #1 pick of two years ago can’t play (Shannon Brown). The Cavaliers decided NOT pick up the third year of Brown’s contract – an unprecedented act. It would have cost the team less that $2 million. That’s peanuts. Either Brown is a total bust or the Cavaliers have no clue. Either way it’s bad.

I would have played the kid some to see what he can do. But this organization, from top to bottom (GM & Head Coach), is obviously in agreement on Brown. The young man can’t get off the bench and it’s not like he has perennial all-stars ahead of him.

I repeat my mantra – this team has won 50 games the past two years despite Ferry’s efforts. He has done more to harm the team’s on-court efforts than to help The only reason this team wins 50 is because James is the best player in the league – along with Steve Nash - at making teammates look a lot better than they are.

In my book, DF has three months in my book to get this right.

Browns - Ravens
They’d better win in Baltimore. The Browns are better going in when you look at two of the three phases of the game – offense and special teams. That means they should come away with a victory. If they don’t, they will be a mediocre 5-5 with six remaining.

Romeo or Chud
Quick question – who would you rather keep next year – RC or the ‘O” coordinator (CHUD)?

Think about it. Chud has transformed this offense into one of the most potent in the league. Granted, he has an offensive line to work with, but you can tell the scheme he’s using works. Meanwhile, RC, a defensive-minded coach, has one of the worst defenses in the NFL in his third year at the helm, and his in-game management abilities have been seriously questioned.

If this team does not make the playoffs with this cake-walk of a schedule, the Browns should look long and hard at keeping Chud and replacing RC. They won’t though. The organization will not can RC if they finish at 8-8.

I’m not asking them to name CHUD the head coach, I’m asking them to sweeten his deal and bring in Cowher or Marty - again. I couldn’t see either of those head coaches having such an awful defenses in year #3 of their regime. Could you?

Indians
I hear the Indians are making a real effort at signing CC and that he is receptive to coming back. I’ll believe it when I see it. If they can re-sign the big fella, it will be the most important signing in the franchise’s history - by far. I don’t see it happening however in today’s market.

If they can’t, remember what we said – they have to deal him in spring training. If they do it right, they could get a great deal of young talent that could sustain their run several more years.

Just like signing him would be a HUGE achievement, allowing him to walk would be the worse move this current regime (Shapiro) has ever made.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Browns Not Ready For This

Good Teams Find Ways To Win

As the Browns’ were letting a win slip out of their grasp in Pittsburgh, my son said it best -“DA isn’t ready for this.”

He’s close. I would change the noun in the sentence from DA to They aren’t ready for this.

It is true, Anderson showed that he’s not ready for prime-time yet, with a pitiful second half performance. The vaunted Steelers’ defense didn’t sack him in the first half – hardly touched him. They didn’t sack him in the second half – hardly touched him.

All the Steelers did was mix up their coverages better in the second stanza. That was obviously enough to bother the gangly signal-caller. DA was slow in his reads and late or behind in many of his second half throws. In fact, he hardly took any shots downfield – a sign that he was losing that gunslinger mentality.

And if you look at the first half, the only real drive the Browns had was their first of the game – a near perfect march by DA and company that resulted in a receiving score to K. Winslow. The other two touchdowns were set up by a kick return, an interception and terrific tightrope job by Edwards that was overturned in the Browns’ favor by replay.

Anyway you look at it, they went nearly two full quarters without a first down. And it’s not because the Steelers were manhandling the Browns up front. The quarterback lost it for a time and never got it back in time to pull this one out.

But you can’t put it all on Anderson.

The defense was terrible again – allowing 30+ points, another 100-yard rusher, the Steelers to convert on numerous third and longs, etc…etc…etc…You’ve seen this act all season long.

There was a pass rush sighting. The Browns sacked Big Ben four times. But give BR credit, he made a number of big plays in the second half – both with his arm and his legs, and willed his team to this win.

The Steelers had the advantage at the most critical position on the field – regardless what the final statistics may show. In the end, that was a key to the outcome of the game.

Coaching Errors
RC and his staff also gagged by wasting two timeouts on a needless challenge. Yea, they could have used an extra timeout in the final seconds to get Dawson closer.

The Steelers' coaching staff obviously felt sorry for RC and company by running dive plays on first and second down, then having Big Ben run what looked like a quarterback draw on third down in their last possession deep in their end. Pittsburgh was playing to lose rather than playing to win. Someone forgot to tell Tomlin and company the Steelers were moving the football at will until that point. One first down seals it. They decided to run and punt.

Huge Special Teams Edge
Regardless, the Browns bailed them out by having their one special team miscue of the day – a penalty on the Steelers’ final punt.

And no, that didn’t lose the game.

The special teams gave you what amounted to 14 points with Josh Cribbs returning one kick for a score and another inside the Steelers’ five yard line. The only reason the Browns were in this game was because of terrific special teams play.

If I told you at noon today the Browns would get two great returns from Cribbs and the offensive line would keep DA’s uniform clean all day long, you would put this one in the win column.

No such luck.

But let’s keep an eye on the big picture. They needed to split these two divisional road games. A win next week in Baltimore puts them at 6-4 with six very winnable games to play.

Who said I’m always negative?

As for today, the truth is in the final score - they aren’t ready for this yet.

Browns-Steelers 2

10 Questions To Ask Going In

Can they match the Steelers’ physical play?

All too often since '99 (the return), the Steelers have manhandled the Browns – especially up front, enabling them to spend most of the final quarter smiling and laughing on the sidelines as if this was a walk in the park. This will be a good barometer of how tough, literally, this Browns team really is.

Will the Browns be able to establish enough of a running game to keep the blitzing Steelers honest?

If the Steelers can pin their ears back, it will be a very long day. This is why Jamaal Lewis was signed. The line needs to run block well and JL needs to pick up the tough yards today.

Can the defense redeem itself?

The Browns are lauding the fact that the defense has tightened in the second half of games recently – holding teams to field goals instead of touchdowns, and making key short yardage stops. Today, they’ll need to play four good quarters if they expect to be in this game late.

Who will make plays on the defensive side of the football?

The Browns have had very few big plays from their front seven this fall. Today would be a good time for someone to step up and deliver.

Will DA have time?

This is the one question I am most intrigued by. The offensive line has played magnificently this fall. The line needs to give the Browns’ receivers time to get downfield, and DA the protection necessary for him to go through his progressions. If they can provide good protection against this front seven, they have truly arrived.

Will DA make more good plays than bad?

This one is simple. If Anderson plays well against a first place team, on the road, he will establish himself as a starting QB in this league. This is truly his “paycheck” game. His agent knows it, he knows it, the Browns’ hierarchy knows it and those who truly understand football know it. This is his showcase game. He’s not playing so much for the Browns today, as much as for the rest of the league.

Can RC & company handle it?

I’m not impressed by beating winless teams or .500 teams in your building. In year #3 of your program, you should be handling those clubs. I want to see if this coaching staff can prepare this team to play well, in arguably the most hostile environment in pro football, and make the necessary in-game adjustments to be competitive until the final whistle.

Will they keep it simple (KISS) or crack under the pressure?

This is where you get the ball in the hands of your playmakers as much as possible - where your stars should shine.

Will their #1 & #2 continue their development?

Thomas has played well this season and Wright has shown some improvement over the course of the past eight weeks. The Browns will need these rookies to protect the blind side and to help the defense get off the field on third down today.

Can the special teams be special?

Winning the special teams match-up could go a long way in deciding who gets the “W” today?
Josh Cribbs and company need to perform.

Prediction
Unfortunately, we see the Steelers pulling away late and earning a two-score win (30-20). However, I’ve been wrong before – like when I said Custer had it under control at Little Big Horn.

Monday, November 5, 2007

Browns' Legitimacy

5-3
We felt and stated several weeks ago with the Browns' 2007 schedule shaping up to be as difficult as an Ohio State non-conference slate, Cleveland could very well go 9-7 or even 10-6 this season.

The win over Seattle puts them in a very good position at the halfway mark. It was the first step toward legitimacy.

While playing "murdered row" - Miami, bye week, and St Louis - we reflected that if they could go 2-1 against Seattle, Pittsburgh & Baltimore, the Browns would have a real shot at post-season. One win on the road in the next two weeks puts them at 6-4 with six winnable games left on the schedule. A 4-2 mark down the stretch is very possible. That's 10 wins - the magic number that usually gets you in.

I don't belive in luck, but sometimes, things go your way - like the Rams having to play without their best player (starting RB) for much of the game or the officials overturning a Seattle first down late in the game when the evidence was inconclusive - at best. The Browns seem to be living right in '07. Good for them.

Who Needs Defense
When your offense scores nearly 30 points every week, your defense only needs to make a few key stops to give your team a chance to win. That's been the case the past couple games with the defense making key stops on short yardage downs to get off the field in key moments. The only part of the defense that has been somewhat effective this fall has been the team's short yardage unit.

Mid-Season Grades
We'll go by units.

QB - DA gets a B+. ..He's won the games he should win at QB playing behind nearly flawless protection, coupled with a solid running game and a very good group of wide receivers. He needs to step up and play well against a good opponent on the road before we consider changing our mind that he's only between the 30th to 60th best QB in the free world.

RB - B+...The ground game has been solid. Not great, but solid.

WRs - A-...Winslow is a Pro-Bowl talent, JJ is a quality #2 and Braylon is Braylon - an excellent athlete who may also go to Hawaii while leading the NFL this season in both TD grabs and drops.
OL - A+...They run block pretty well and have kept DA not only upright, but given him excellent passing lanes from which to throw.

DL - D...No run defense and no pass rush.

LB - D...I can't point to five big plays by the Browns' LBs after eight weeks of play.

CB - C...Bodden is solid and the rookie (Wright) is learning.

S - D...The safeties have not covered at all, nor have they provided consistent run support.

Special teams - B+...The only real blemish was the blocked FG versus the Raiders. That one hurt.

RC - B+...No, I'm not giving Romeo an A even thought the Browns are 5-3. The record is a residue effect of the schedule as much as anything else.

Remember, legitimacy arrives when you beat good teams in their building. The Browns have two shots at it in the next two weeks.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Season-Opening NBA Hits

DejaVu For The Cavaliers
I'll make this quick on the Cavaliers - they have not improved their personnel over a year ago, when they had a very favorable playoff schedule and LJ went MJ on the Pistons in game #5. We thought they would win 50 in 2006-07 and be a second round out. Ditto for 2007-08.

That A Boy Danny
I give Danny Ainge kudos for having a huge pair. He picked up a couple of all-stars - changing the perception of the Celtics with two swift moves. They should be very competitive and a tough playoff out come April after being together a full season.

Kobe
The most selfish player in the history of the NBA (Kobe Bryant), and perhaps the greatest one-on-one player the league has ever seen, will likely end up in Dallas or Chicago since those clubs seem to have the depth and type of young talent the Lakers crave/need. If he comes east, it might change the complexion of the conference's post-season landscape.

The Finals
Last year - before this columns was up and running - we liked the Spurs over the Pistons in seven. You'll have to trust me on that one. This year, we have decided to insert Celitcs in place of Pistons. The Spurs in six over Boston in 2007-08.

Why?

The Spurs are still very good. And the Celtics have three outstanding players, who can see the end of their careers on the horizon, and will do whatever it takes to compete for a ring. If they stay healthy and get any kind of play, especially at the defensive end from the supporting cast, the East is wide open for them to possibly reach the Finals.

Pretty Boys
You know me by now - I don't like the pretty teams - Dallas, Phoenix, etc.., who score and score and score, accumulate 60+ wins or more in the regular season, look great on television, but don't defend every night (read: too soft). I'm still waiting for one of those teams to win it all. When they do, I'll give them credit for getting it done. Until then, I'm right and the pro pundits are all wrong - again. I must have heard this a dozen times last year from the talking heads on the air - "The Mavs will with it all in 2006-07 because they have improved tremendously on the defensive end."

Right. Some of the same crew thought Kobe could win big in LA without "the Big Deisel."

MVP
LJ should again be the best player in the league this season. Notice I said again. If he can once again get them to 50 wins and carry this bunch deep into the post-season in 2007-08, he's earned it in my book. Again, I can't think of a team in the last 30 years that reached the NBA Finals with less talent than the 2006-07 Cavaliers.

Ode to 23
No recent player has done so much, with so little help, for so long.
R. Jampo

Now my one quick shot at LJ - he should be the best post up player in the game. I heard he worked on that facet of his game over the summer. We'll be watching. He should be unguardable in the blocks. That would help when the jumper isn't falling - which is half the time. It would also save on some of the wear and tear on the body from having to drive to the hole so much.

By the way, picking an MVP because of what they accomplished in the regular season is about the dumbest thing in sports. I never fell for Dirk N. being the best player in the sport last year - even when he was throwing in 30 and grabbing 10 boards in some meaningless regular season game in mid-January. Soft has four letters - DIRK.

There is a world of difference between the NBA in the regular season and playing a quality opponent five/seven times over the course of two weeks in the spring, when they have the opportunity to really game-plan how to lock you down.

Browns/Rams Post-Script
I am not going soft on the Browns. I have gotten several inquiries on this topic. They don't call me "the prince of darkness" for nothing.

Follow me here - All I said was they have a playoff caliber offense right now, good special teams and have been the recipient of a ridiculously easy schedule. Again, if their QB doesn't implode, they should win more than they lose this season based on who is left to play. That doesn't mean they are the 1972 Dolphins - far from it. This Sunday's game will be watched closely. Good teams win at home against the likes of Seattle. Period.

P.S. #2 Did I tell you I can't stand BB? Better yet, did you know Seidel was a vegan? (inside joke).






Who's In The Fianls

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Tribe Year End Grades

Let’s start from the top down.

Ownership: A-
The Dolan family committed huge money to Travis Hafner – the largest contract ever given to an Indians’ player, among other notable long-term signings recently. They opened up the purse strings. However, this current organization has never taken on a relatively large contract in the middle of the season for the stretch run. We will also watch closely the offer made to CC. Signing him is arguably the single most important move they will make in the next several years.

Mark Shapiro: A
We have covered this already. He has produced an excellent farm system and a playoff team (96 wins) in 2007 with a mid-range budget. He should get votes for MLB GM of the Year honors.

Eric Wedge: A
“Mr. Vanilla” isn’t flashy or creative, but he grinded out 96 wins and got the Tribe within one win of the World Series with his best hitter having a sub-par year. He should be a shoe-in for AL Manager of the Year in 2007.

Victor Martinez: A
He was their best everyday player in 2007. He improved his throwing and hit .300 again. Who else would you want at the plate on this club in crunch time?

Ryan Garko: B
He isn’t pretty to watch – a pretty good hitter who can’t field much at 1B. But his offensive numbers were pretty good for a veteran – much less a rookie.

Astrubal Cabrera: A-
He played like he belonged from day one – solidifying the line-up in the #2 hole while playing solid defense at 2B. He trailed off some in the post-season, but has a bright future.

Jhonny Peralta: B
He bounced back after a sub-par year in 2006 – mainly due to a great first half offensively in ‘07. In the post-steroids era, a 20 homer/75 RBI middle-infielder is hard to find. In fact, he led all SS in HRs this season. He’ll never win a Gold Glove and a move to 2B seems logical with AC being better defensively at SS. I would resist the urge to deal him, even though that will be the talk from much of the local media and an uneducated fan base.

Casey Blake: B-
In my Webster’s Dictionary (Deluxe Second Edition), under average major league player, it has a picture of Casey Blake - without the facial hair. He’s a decent fielder, decent hitter, with decent power, who runs decently. Actually, he is a terrific athlete in that he can play several positions relatively well – but you get the point. If he’s making the league average - $4-5 million per - he’s worth keeping in the #8 or #9 hole while playing 3B.

Left field: C+
Kenny Lofton gave them a jolt when he came on board. However, this position needs some attention. But don’t expect them to go out and sign a 30 homer/100 RBI leftfielder over the winter. They don’t have the money. You are likely to see another platoon there.

Grady Sizemore: B+
My chip is coming through here. He has a world of talent – but the lack of contact at the plate is a real problem. Yes, he’s very good. But I’m not falling for the hype. He should be a .300 hitter and needs to step up in the playoffs. There’s nothing worse than a guy with terrific talent who doesn’t use it all.

Right field: B
Gutierrez got most of the at bats in the second half and did a nice job. He, like many of his teammates, struggled in the playoffs. However, he earned 500 ABs in 2008. We aren’t likely to see another platoon situation there next summer – unless he fails.

Travis Hafner: C-
We’ve covered this with TH since July, before anyone else even bothered to pay attention. If you are a DH, you have to hit. It’s that simple. He didn’t hit nearly enough in the regular season and was MIA in the playoffs. Don’t fool yourself, the Indians will need a big rebound year from him next summer if they hope to be as good in 2008 as they were in 2007. I'm a Hafner fan on a personal level - he's a good community guy.

CC: A-
He was a true #1 during the regular season. The post-season was a different story. We’ll see if he gives them a “hometown discount.” I doubt it.

Carmona: A
He gets the A because he was the “X Factor” that got them in. No one – absolutely – no one, expected this kind of year from him after his 2006 season. We’ll give him somewhat of a pass for his meltdown against the Sox because he’s a kid.

The Rafael Tandem: A
The Indians had the best combination of set-up men in baseball this year. They were outstanding all regular season long. Yes, Betancourt was much better than Perez in the post-season. But overall, they both had terrific seasons. I can’t imagine them being any better over 162 games.

Paul Byrd: A-
He got the most out of his talent and pitched well in the post-season. He has an option left and should return.

Jake Westbrook: B-
His regular season was so-so – partly due to injury. He was better down the stretch and in the playoffs. He’s a solid middle of the rotation starter.

Lewis/Laffey: B+
The Indians’ farm system came through big-time, providing the big club with much-needed depth on the mound following flame outs by Lee and Sowers.

Kelly Shoppach: B+
Shoppach is an outstanding #2 who did a nice job handling Byrd and filling in for Victor. He’s an excellent defensive catcher with some pop in the bat. The Tribe would be wise to sign him long-term, especially if they want to continue to give VM some work at 1B. Quality receivers are especially hard to find.

What would I do heading into 2008?

I’m glad you asked.

First and foremost, make every attempt to sign CC in the off-season. If it is clear that is not going to happen, I would deal him before the 2008 regular season began. The temptation will be to keep him and make another run before they part company after ’08. Shapiro already said that’s his route if they can’t sign him.

I’m thinking long-term, here. I let the Yankees, Red Sox, etc… know he’s available – if I can’t sign him – and wait for the bids to come in. From a PR standpoint, you take a short-term hit with the fans, but the talent level that would be coming back in return should soften the blow some. And three years from now, intelligent observers will recognize that was the right move if the guys you get in return can play. This is where your scouting staff has to come through.

If you can’t sign them – you can’t let them walk (see:Belle, Ramirez, Thome). Others will see it differently. Again, I am thinking long-term on this one.

Secondly, move Cabrera to short and JP to second. We’ve covered this numerous times already. It makes sense. Although, I already heard Shapiro saying JP is the team’s SS in 2008. That makes no sense. Ask the pitchers on the roster who they would rather have at SS. It is simple, you play your best defensive middle infielder at SS if you have that luxury. They do.

Third, the organization has good depth in terms of pitching – especially starters. That’s rare in baseball. I would look to move a couple of those arms in search of an OF bat prospect that is clearly better than anything I have in the system.

The good news is there aren’t many serious holes on this team. The holes they have (i.e. leftfield), can’t be filled through free agency because the money isn’t there. Their 2008 roster will likely look a lot like the 2007 team.

The Indians should have a good club in 2008. But remember, the Yankees and Red Sox can add major talent in the off-season, because they have the cash, and they can make adjustments in-season, again, because they have the cash.

Those are the teams you are likely going to have to beat if you want to win a World Series and play in the AL. That isn’t going to change with the current system in place.

Let’s hope they stay healthy,, they sign CC, Carmona is the real deal, Travis bounces back and the Rafael boys are outstanding once again next summer. If those things happen, they’ll be playing in October in ’08.